<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Apple still a computer company?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company</link>
	<description>where no mac has gone before</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MatzeLoCal</title>
		<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>MatzeLoCal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-506</guid>
		<description>Apple is not advertising it's OS or Computers? You should take a look at some of the latest Wired-mags...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is not advertising it&#8217;s OS or Computers? You should take a look at some of the latest Wired-mags&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-444</guid>
		<description>I dont think Apple will just use Intels ready made stuff. It looks like they will have Intel create a chip for them and work around that. So that means that it may not even be a fully x86 based CPU which is created for the new Apples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think Apple will just use Intels ready made stuff. It looks like they will have Intel create a chip for them and work around that. So that means that it may not even be a fully x86 based CPU which is created for the new Apples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guigui de nice</title>
		<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>guigui de nice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-399</guid>
		<description>... like switching to intel ... of course ;-) 
they would never do that if everything was centered on the powerpc/osX duo

apple is gonna kick microsoft butt one day i tell you my friend, on the software side they just act like microsoft though they buy every best solutions; i am happy they bought emagic; logic is so cool;, its unbeaten i cant wait to see it running again on x86 it did pretty well back in lap5.5, cant imagine using 4 x86 and get all the plugins easy ported from vsti winblows stuff

cant wait to see that, yo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; like switching to intel &#8230; of course ;-)<br />
they would never do that if everything was centered on the powerpc/osX duo</p>
<p>apple is gonna kick microsoft butt one day i tell you my friend, on the software side they just act like microsoft though they buy every best solutions; i am happy they bought emagic; logic is so cool;, its unbeaten i cant wait to see it running again on x86 it did pretty well back in lap5.5, cant imagine using 4 x86 and get all the plugins easy ported from vsti winblows stuff</p>
<p>cant wait to see that, yo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guigui de nice</title>
		<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>guigui de nice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-398</guid>
		<description>hey pple,

apple is still and will remain a computer company. Of course they
are focusing on  mass market easy-to-use devices but that is just a 
way of taking less risks to strenghten the architecture 

think about it

guigui de nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey pple,</p>
<p>apple is still and will remain a computer company. Of course they<br />
are focusing on  mass market easy-to-use devices but that is just a<br />
way of taking less risks to strenghten the architecture </p>
<p>think about it</p>
<p>guigui de nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cw</title>
		<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>cw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 04:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-372</guid>
		<description>I use both mac and amd computers and I haven't seen a mac that will run as fast as the 64 bit amd let alone there x2 proc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use both mac and amd computers and I haven&#8217;t seen a mac that will run as fast as the 64 bit amd let alone there x2 proc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldTimeMac-er</title>
		<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>OldTimeMac-er</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-367</guid>
		<description>They are still a computer company, just one that is leveraging out of the HW business... unless they can use HW design to differentiate their products (see iPod success) - their software solutions are so solid that they (rightly so) should be focused AWAY from the innards that no one really cares about except for the performance which I believe Intel will be well suited to meet the demands... Apple's has dramatically increased the market value of the stock since they realized they are NOT a computer company but a CONSUMER ELECTRONICS company that will make more money by focusing on what people do with their products, not focusing on what processor sits in the box... as long as the performance continues to increase Apple loyalists will buy and more Wintel slaves will convert - they key is 1) ease of use 2) convenience 3) performance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are still a computer company, just one that is leveraging out of the HW business&#8230; unless they can use HW design to differentiate their products (see iPod success) - their software solutions are so solid that they (rightly so) should be focused AWAY from the innards that no one really cares about except for the performance which I believe Intel will be well suited to meet the demands&#8230; Apple&#8217;s has dramatically increased the market value of the stock since they realized they are NOT a computer company but a CONSUMER ELECTRONICS company that will make more money by focusing on what people do with their products, not focusing on what processor sits in the box&#8230; as long as the performance continues to increase Apple loyalists will buy and more Wintel slaves will convert - they key is 1) ease of use 2) convenience 3) performance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 12:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-261</guid>
		<description>The iPod is an embedded device, what it is not is a computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iPod is an embedded device, what it is not is a computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/is-apple-still-a-computer-company#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Apple is and will always be a computer company; they're just forward-thinking.  The iPod is a computer.  Apple will continue to add features to the iPod, and eventually it will be all you need.  It will have the OS on it, with a mini wireless module built into it.  Once wi-fi max really takes off you'll be able to use your iPod to check email and get driving direction, etc.  Then when you get home, just set it in your dock and it will display through your monitor and be controlled through your bluetooth, wireless keyboard and mouse.  Apple's way ahead on this obvious next move for computing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is and will always be a computer company; they&#8217;re just forward-thinking.  The iPod is a computer.  Apple will continue to add features to the iPod, and eventually it will be all you need.  It will have the OS on it, with a mini wireless module built into it.  Once wi-fi max really takes off you&#8217;ll be able to use your iPod to check email and get driving direction, etc.  Then when you get home, just set it in your dock and it will display through your monitor and be controlled through your bluetooth, wireless keyboard and mouse.  Apple&#8217;s way ahead on this obvious next move for computing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
