<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RAW support: major changes in Leopard?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/raw-support-major-changes-in-leopard/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/raw-support-major-changes-in-leopard</link>
	<description>where no mac has gone before</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HardMac&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Aperture 2 sports an image processing plugin architecture</title>
		<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/raw-support-major-changes-in-leopard/comment-page-1#comment-55630</link>
		<dc:creator>HardMac&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Aperture 2 sports an image processing plugin architecture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/raw-support-major-changes-in-leopard#comment-55630</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] couple days ago I posted about major changes to RAW support and concluded by this:  That seems weird, unless you consider a system that would work as [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] couple days ago I posted about major changes to RAW support and concluded by this:  That seems weird, unless you consider a system that would work as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moose</title>
		<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/raw-support-major-changes-in-leopard/comment-page-1#comment-55621</link>
		<dc:creator>moose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/raw-support-major-changes-in-leopard#comment-55621</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm the way I see it is that Apple will release an Aperture update (soon?) that will work on both Tiger and Leopard. But I sort of liked the idea of having a system-wide unified support for RAW formats.
Mind you, there STILL is a system-wide support, it is just that Aperture seems to not rely on it anymore.
And people complaining how including the RAW support in system-wide updates makes it slow and clumsy for Apple to add new camera formats should be satisfied if Aperture moves to a "plugin" system that would allow to simply add RAW descriptors on a camera-by-cmera basis.
Wait and see...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm the way I see it is that Apple will release an Aperture update (soon?) that will work on both Tiger and Leopard. But I sort of liked the idea of having a system-wide unified support for RAW formats.<br />
Mind you, there STILL is a system-wide support, it is just that Aperture seems to not rely on it anymore.<br />
And people complaining how including the RAW support in system-wide updates makes it slow and clumsy for Apple to add new camera formats should be satisfied if Aperture moves to a &#8220;plugin&#8221; system that would allow to simply add RAW descriptors on a camera-by-cmera basis.<br />
Wait and see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linathael</title>
		<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/raw-support-major-changes-in-leopard/comment-page-1#comment-55619</link>
		<dc:creator>linathael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/raw-support-major-changes-in-leopard#comment-55619</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;indeed, it is really weird, as it would mean that photo amateurs or Pro will have to move to Leopard to get RAW support, but at the same time theyr will not be able to use Aperture anymore...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>indeed, it is really weird, as it would mean that photo amateurs or Pro will have to move to Leopard to get RAW support, but at the same time theyr will not be able to use Aperture anymore&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
