<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Machine will only do proper backups if Aperture is not running</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/time-machine-will-only-do-proper-backups-if-aperture-is-not-running/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/time-machine-will-only-do-proper-backups-if-aperture-is-not-running</link>
	<description>where no mac has gone before</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: HardMac&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Time Machine may back up the entire Aperture Library on each run&#8221;. No, really?</title>
		<link>http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/time-machine-will-only-do-proper-backups-if-aperture-is-not-running#comment-56095</link>
		<dc:creator>HardMac&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Time Machine may back up the entire Aperture Library on each run&#8221;. No, really?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hardmac.com/archives/time-machine-will-only-do-proper-backups-if-aperture-is-not-running#comment-56095</guid>
		<description>[...] once Aperture quits, rather than just the changes since the previous backup.  As I pointed out in a previous post, this is a real pain in the lens. At least Apple is acknowledging the problem, but as when they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] once Aperture quits, rather than just the changes since the previous backup.  As I pointed out in a previous post, this is a real pain in the lens. At least Apple is acknowledging the problem, but as when they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
